Performance of int/long in Python 3

Neil Hodgson nhodgson at iinet.net.au
Wed Apr 3 04:22:32 EDT 2013


rusi:

> Can you please try one more experiment Neil?
> Knock off all non-ASCII strings (paths) from your dataset and try
> again.

    Results are the same 0.40 (well, 0.001 less but I don't think the 
timer is that accurate) for Python 3.2 and 0.78 for Python 3.3.

    Neil



More information about the Python-list mailing list