Article on the future of Python

[Mark Lawrence]

On 26/09/2012 15:50, wxjmfauth at gmail.com wrote:
> I should add that I have not the knowledge to dive
> in the Python code. But I "see" what has been done.

How?

> As I have a very good understanding of all this
> coding of characters stuff, I can just pick up
> - in fact select characters or combination
> of characters - which I supspect to be problematic
> and I see the results.

Have you run the Python benchmarks yet, as people have more trust in 
something tangible than a claim that "I see the results"?  You were 
asked to do this one month ago.  If yes please publish your results.  If 
no why not, if your claims were correct running the benchmarks would 
obviously support you?

>
> Not only this, I can select characters, I know
> a user is supposed to use or will use eg. a specific
> scrit/language, a typographical work, ...
> (Do not ask how and why, I know this).

Please state how and why.

>
> I'm not interesting in the other languages or in
> unicode therory (also I not bad on this level).

Please prove your statement in brackets, nothing less is acceptable if 
you're making claims, you need to substantiate them.

>
> I just see the results and the facts. For an end
> user, this is the only thing that counts.

The modern day Pinball Wizard?  Or a physic?  Or what?

>
> jmf
>

#pseudo code
for _ in range(-inf, +inf, 1): print(FUD)

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.