set and dict iteration
88888 Dihedral
dihedral88888 at googlemail.com
Mon Sep 10 16:14:38 EDT 2012
Paul Rubin於 2012年8月17日星期五UTC+8上午9時01分39秒寫道:
> Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > With regard to key insertion and deletion while iterating over a dict
>
> > or set, though, there is just no good reason to be doing that
>
> > (especially as the result is very implementation-specific), and I
>
> > wouldn't mind a more complete low-level check against it as long as
>
> > it's not too expensive (which is not clearly the case with the current
>
> > suggestion at all).
>
>
>
> One possible approach is to freeze the dictionary against modification
>
> while any iterator is open on it. You could keep a count of active
>
> iterators in the dict structure, adjusting it whenever an iterator is
>
> created or closed/destroyed.
If there is only one iterator of a frozen dictionary,
then nothing is saved.
But if there are manny iterators based on the same frozen dictionary,
this approach saves a lot.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list