Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib

[Alex Clark]

On 2012-10-21 16:59:16 +0000, Dennis Lee Bieber said:

> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:41:52 -0600, Jason Friedman <jason at powerpull.net>
> declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
> 
>> 
>> Pretty slick.  My only concern is portability, are there other
>> examples of modules (excepting Win32) that work on some platforms and
>> not others?
> 
> 	Just scan the library reference and you'll find a number of
> modules/functions that, even if available on all OS, behave slightly
> differently (look up mmap, for example; or readline)

I was just getting used to it as PBS :-) Other than really liking your 
lib… I'm not convinced it would be a good candidate for the stdlib, 
yet. E.g. Not every good lib belongs in the stdlib. That said, if sh.py 
continues to gain popularity (akin to e.g. requests) I suspect the 
"right people" (core developers?) will see it. I'm also curious how 
that happens, would a PEP be a good place to propose inclusion in the 
stdlib?


-- 
Alex Clark · https://www.gittip.com/aclark4life/