re.search when used within an if/else fails
Kevin T
kevinintx at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 14:09:12 EST 2012
On Monday, November 19, 2012 7:29:20 PM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:24:54 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>
>
> - use "if something is None", not == None.
>
>
> Steven
i will not include line #'s in the future, point taken
i will change ==/!= to is/is not as most people pointed out.
there is no else because it doesn't work.
i used eclipse in debug mode and a command line execution of the code, both behave the same way
#if re.search( "rsrvd", sigName ) : #version a
#if re.search( "rsrvd", sigName ) == None : #version b
if re.search( "rsrvd", sigName ) is None : #version bb
print sigName
newVal = "%s%s" % ('1'*signal['bits'] , newVal )
#else: #version c
if re.search( "rsrvd", sigName ) != None : #version d
print sigName
newVal = "%s%s" % ( '0'*signal['bits'],> newVal )
i can use either version a/b the else clause (version c) will not execute.
fortunately, with version bb, the else clause will execute!!
thanks for the input all..
kevin
Now if i change
More information about the Python-list
mailing list