Problem with time.time() standing still

[Bob Cowdery]

On 06/05/2012 00:11, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Bob Cowdery <bob at bobcowdery.plus.com> wrote:
>> The time.clock() function does increment correctly. CPU is around 30%
> 30% of how many cores? If that's a quad-core processor, that could
> indicate one core completely pegged plus a little usage elsewhere.
It is a quad core but no CPU is pegged as there are a number of threads
running in C. It's reasonably well spread.
>
> ChrisA