On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 16:46:48 -0500, Evan Driscoll wrote: > On 01/-10/-28163 01:59 PM, Alexander Blinne wrote: >> 5+0 is actually 4+0, because 5 == 4, so 5+0 gives 4. 5+1 is actually >> 4+1, which is 5, but 5 is again 4. 5+2 is 4+2 which is 6. > > Now all I can think is "Hoory for new math, new-hoo-hoo math" :-) +1 QOTW -- Steven