Py 3.3, unicode / upper()
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu Dec 20 17:48:04 EST 2012
On 12/20/2012 2:40 PM, wxjmfauth at gmail.com wrote:
> What should a Python user think, if he sees his strings
> are comsuming more memory just because he uses non ascii
> characters
What should a Python user think, if he (or she) sees his (or her)
strings sometimes or often consuming less memory than they did previously?
I think the person should be grateful that people volunteered to make
the improvement, rather than ungratefully bitch about it.
> or he sees his strings are changing just because
> he "uppercases" them.
Uppercasing strings is supposed to change strings.
> Unicode is here to serve anybody.
This we agree on. Python3.3 unicode serves everybody better than 3.2 does.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-list
mailing list