Is __ne__ method autogenerated?

[Chris Rebert]

On Thursday, December 6, 2012, INADA Naoki wrote:

> The reference says:
>
>   The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is false.
>   Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should also
>   define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as expected.
>
> (http://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__eq__)
>
> But I saw different behavior on 3.3:
> https://gist.github.com/4231096
>
> Could anyone teach me what happen about my code?
>

The reference is not completely accurate in this case. See
 http://bugs.python.org/issue4395
"Document auto __ne__ generation; [...]"


-- 
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://rebertia.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20121206/c9b36fa0/attachment.html>