Only Bytecode, No .py Files

[Ethan Furman]

John Roth wrote:
>> ACK. That is exactly what I wanted to show. (With the difference that
>> this is probably nt the bash, but the linux loader trying to link a .so,
>> but for the problem, it doesn't make any difference.)
> 
> Sorry. I thought what you posted was from the OP. I guess I don't
> really expect someone to post a completely irrelevant trace in a
> thread started by someone who has a problem.

The trace was showing the same results in an effort to demonstrate that 
the "problem" was just normal operations.  This is very relevant.

~Ethan~