Lisp refactoring puzzle

[Gregory Ewing]

Teemu Likonen wrote:

> Please don't forget that the whole point of Lisps' (f x) syntax is that
> code is also Lisp data.

It's possible to design other syntaxes that have a similar
property. Prolog, for example -- a Prolog program is expressed
in terms of Prolog data structures, yet it manages to have
things that look like fairly normal function calls and infix
expressions.

-- 
Greg