Questions about LISP and Python.

[alex23]

Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohn... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone who would take the time to write *articulate* suggestions for
> grave deficiencies in the Python documentation must care.

And you're including yourself here by implication, yes?

You have _zero_ desire to see any real improvements to Python and
instead want to come here on a regular basis and show us how big your
brain is. Like Xah, you're unable to grasp that programming is a
_communal_ exercise. You both vilify _everyone_ who doesn't loudly
proclaim your brilliance. You refuse to accept that there are _ways_
of approaching the community to encourage interaction: being a smug
cunt is not one of them. Even worse, the _more_ people point out to
you both how wrong you are, the _more_ convinced you're correct,
because of a bullshit belief in your superiority. You are both
astounding exemplars of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

You're a _troll_. You contribute nothing of value, you hijack threads
for your own agenda, you are _nothing but a source of noise_ to this
list. The months in which you don't post are an absolute goddamn
_delight_ and there would be no loss to anyone if you decided to just
fuck off and take your exercise in public masturbation elsewhere.