pylint -- should I just ignore it sometimes?

[Jean-Michel Pichavant]

>> You
>> won't be that happy everyone wrote their mail in this list like a mobile
>> text message, if u c what I mean.
>>     
>
> I never suggested that. What I am trying to get across is that long names 
> are not automatically better than short names, and even one letter names 
> can be as good or better than long names *when appropriate*.
>
>
>   

You misunderstood my point, I'm not pro long names, I'm pro descriptive 
names, It can be short if descriptive:

for o, c in cars:
    park(o)
    phone(c)

for owner, car in cars: # by just using meaningful names you give the 
info to the reader that you expect cars to be a list of tuple (owner, car)
    park(owner)
    phone(car) # see how it is easier to spot bug


JM