"Strong typing vs. strong testing"
RG
rNOSPAMon at flownet.com
Fri Oct 1 01:37:17 EDT 2010
In article <87tyl63cag.fsf at mail.geddis.org>,
Don Geddis <don at geddis.org> wrote:
> Keith Thompson <kst-u at mib.org> wrote on Thu, 30 Sep 2010:
> > RG <rNOSPAMon at flownet.com> writes:
> >> You're missing a lot of context. I'm not trying to criticize C, just to
> >> refute a false claim that was made about it.
> > Can you cite the article that made this false claim, and exactly what
> > the false claim was?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/431925448da59481
>
> Message-ID:
> <0497e39d-6bd1-429d-a86f-f4c89babe1a4 at u31g2000pru.googlegroups.com>
> From: TheFlyingDutchman <zzbbaadd at aol.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
>
> [...]
> in C I can have a function maximum(int a, int b) that will always
> work. Never blow up, and never give an invalid answer. If someone
> tries to call it incorrectly it is a compile error.
> [...]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> _
> Don Geddis http://don.geddis.org/
> don at geddis.org
Thanks, Don.
rg
More information about the Python-list
mailing list