Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

[Kirill Simonov]

Erik Max Francis wrote:
> Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>>>> it is my goal (which I may or may not be smart enough to reach) to
>>>> write a module that anybody would want to use;
>>> But you are working on a solution in search of a problem.  The really
>>> smart thing to do would be pick something more useful to work on.  We
>>> don't need another configuration language.  I can't even say "yet
>>> another" because there's already a "yet another" called yaml.
>>
>> And in case you are new here let me assure you that Paul is saying
>> this with his full intention of being helpful to you. I also would
>> think that working on such a project might be fun and educational for
>> you but completely useless if you have users other than yourself in
>> mind. Again, I'm trying to be helpful here, so you can focus on a
>> project that is both fun/educational for you and also potentially
>> useful for others. This RSON business is not one of them.
> 
> Agreed.  Even YAML's acronym indicates that it is already a bridge too 
> far; we don't need more.
> 

Note that YA in the acronym doesn't mean Yet Another, YAML = YAML Ain't 
Markup Language.


Thanks,
Kirill