On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:47:08 -0500 Daniel Stutzbach <daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com> wrote: > > What's new? > ----------- > > - blist.sort() is now *substantially* faster than list.sort() when using int > or float keys (O(n) vs. O(n log n)) Are you using some kind of radix sort? Could it be contributed back into the standard list type? Regards Antoine.