The real problem with Python 3 - no business case for conversion (was "I strongly dislike Python 3")

[MRAB]

Brendan Abel wrote:
>>>> One thing that would be very useful is how to maintain something that
>>>> works on 2.x and 3.x, but not limiting yourself to 2.6. Giving up
>>>> versions below 2.6 is out of the question for most projects with a
>>>> significant userbase IMHO. As such, the idea of running the python 3
>>>> warnings is not so useful IMHO - unless it could be made to work
>>>> better for python 2.x < 2.6, but I am not sure the idea even makes
>>>> sense.
> 
> The entire fact that 3.x was *designed* to be incompatible should tell
> you that supporting 2.x and 3.x with a single code base is a bad idea,
> except for the very smallest of projects.  This is the point where a
> project should fork and provide two different versions.

I wouldn't say that 3.x was designed to be incompatible. It was designed
to tidy the language, and the incompatibilities are an unfortunate
result.