The real problem with Python 3 - no business case for conversion (was "I strongly dislike Python 3")
Philip Semanchuk
philip at semanchuk.com
Mon Jul 5 21:00:17 EDT 2010
On Jul 5, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Philip Semanchuk
> <philip at semanchuk.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:42:13 -0400
>>> Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
>>>> Good start. Now what is blocking those four?
>>>> Lack of developer interest/time/ability?
>>>> or something else that they need?
>>>
>>> How about a basic how-to document? I maintain PyGreSQL and would
>>> like
>>> to move it to 3.x right now but I don't even know what the issues
>>> are.
>>> I can see on the site the 2.x documents and the 3.x documents for
>>> extending with C modules and I can read both from end to end but
>>> that
>>> hits the time issue above. If there was a relatively simple
>>> document
>>> that showed what needed to be changed in the C code we could get
>>> started on the transition sooner.
>>>
>>> Or is there no change at the C level? That would make things easy.
>>
>> There are definitely changes at the C level.
>>
>> I ported two pure C extensions from 2 to 3 and was even able to
>> keep a
>> single C codebase. I'd be willing to contribute my experiences to a
>> document
>> somewhere. (Is there a Wiki?)
>
> Indeed there is: http://wiki.python.org/moin/
Thanks. I don't want to appear ungrateful, but I was hoping for
something specific to the 2-to-3 conversion. I guess someone has to
start somewhere...
More information about the Python-list
mailing list