Lua is faster than Fortran???
Stefan Behnel
stefan_ml at behnel.de
Sun Jul 4 13:51:21 EDT 2010
sturlamolden, 04.07.2010 19:10:
> On 4 Jul, 19:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
>> A number like "1.5 times faster" is meaningless without a specific
>> application and/or code section in mind. I'm pretty sure there are cases
>> where they are much faster than that, and there are cases where the net
>> gain is zero (or -0.x or whatever).
>
> Here is what they say:
>
> Benchmark CPython Unladen Change
> 2to3 25.13 s 24.87 s 1.01x faster
> django 1.08 s 0.68 s 1.59x faster
> html5lib 14.29 s 13.20 s 1.08x faster
> nbody 0.51 s 0.28 s 1.84x faster
> rietveld 0.75 s 0.55 s 1.37x faster
> slowpickle 0.75 s 0.55 s 1.37x faster
> slowspitfire 0.83 s 0.61 s 1.36x faster
> slowunpickle 0.33 s 0.26 s 1.26x faster
> spambayes 0.31 s 0.34 s 1.10x slower
Ok, so, which of those do you care about?
Stefan
More information about the Python-list
mailing list