python 3's adoption

[alex23]

"Alf P. Steinbach" <al... at start.no> wrote:
> Actually not, IMHO. All it does is is to provide incompatibility. They forgot
> Ronald Reagan's old maxim: if it don't need fixin', don't fix it.
[...]
> Probably there must have been some rationale, but to put it bluntly removing the
> comparator is more like moronic than pythonic.

So in both cases, you haven't put any effort into researching why
these decisions were made, but you're happy to jump to conclusions
about the intelligence of the implementer(s) while regularly trotting
out complaints of ad hominem attacks against yourself.

The saddest part of all is you seem to consider yourself some kind of
educator.