ANN: obfuscate 0.2.2

[geremy condra]

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve at remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:00:50 +0000, geremy condra wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>> <steve at remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Steven D'Aprano <steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au> writes:
>>>>> DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not
>>>>> be used where high security is required.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly no one should never use obfuscate's rot13 function for high
>>>> security.  Use at least double-rot13 instead, or maybe even quadruple
>>>> rot13 ;-).
>>>
>>> Ha ha, that's funny! I've never heard that one before! *wink*
>>
>> I think I lost a sarcasm detector to this line- are you being serious?
>
>
> Possibly I overloaded your sarcasm detector and broke it.

I figured, but given how severely it broke I couldn't be sure.
I suppose the fact that you used exclamation points should
have tipped me off, though.

Geremy Condra