New syntax for blocks

[r]

On Nov 11, 9:04 pm, Carl Banks <pavlovevide... at gmail.com> wrote:
(Carl's reply to Steven's comments...)

> Well I don't just want to call a method, so I can't take that advice.
> Some actions will do more than just to call a method.  And I don't
> want to scroll up or down ten screens to see what the actions
> associated with the regexp are.   A dispatcher is out.

+1

The if... elif...  construct that Carl provided coupled with the
proposed new syntax is much cleaner. And i'm not just saying that
because Steven called my idea stupid, well, *maybe* not? ;-)

PS: Does anyone know the textual smiley for apathy?