New syntax for blocks

[Steven D'Aprano]

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:00:09 -0800, Carl Banks wrote:

>> as has been posted before and again in a slightly different form in
>> Steve's post.
> 
> I'm well aware of it, but I didn't think the proposal deserved to be
> called stupid when it was a reasonable solution to a real need, even
> though a workable and less intrusive option exists.

Fair enough, I was feeling grumpy at the time. Perhaps "stupid" was 
unfair. Perhaps.


-- 
Steven