Best library to make XSLT 2.0 transformation

Diez B. Roggisch deets at nospam.web.de
Tue May 19 14:34:32 EDT 2009


John Krukoff schrieb:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 13:42 +0200, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
>> wdveloper wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I need to make xml transformation using XSLT 2.0 (since i want to use
>>> the powerful tag <xsl:result-document> to produce multiple files).
>>> In your experience, which kind of library out there is better?
>> XSLT is a standard, so if you find a library that implements it, there
>> shouldn't be much differences.
>>
>> Having said that, these days lxml2 is the craze, and it contains
>> xslt-processing. It would be my first (and hopefully last) stop.
>>
>> Diez
> 
> While I firmly believe lxml is the best python XML library available,
> being built on libxml2 means that it only supports XSLT 1.0. As far as I
> know, if you want 2.0 support, you still need to be using one of the
> Java XSLT processors.


Ah, sorry, I missed the 2.0 requirement.

Diez



More information about the Python-list mailing list