c.l.py dead, news at 11 (was Re: Mangle function name with decorator?)

[srepmub]

> > Its kind of sad to see unladen swallow, which is just
> > a promise, on the list, whileShedskin, which isn't,
> > is ignored.
>
> > Does this say something about big corporations
> > vs the small man?
>
> I think the programs on the list were supposed to actually implement
> Python and extensions of Python, but not incompatible dialects.
> Otherwise Pyrex (for example) would also be on the list.

for the record, the input for Shedskin is pure Python, so there is no
added syntax or optional type declaration system. that said, I can
understand it not being on some list for not being production-ready.


thanks,
mark dufour.