suggestion for python function calling

[alex goretoy]

maybe this is like decorators
-Alex Goretoy
http://www.goretoy.com



On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:20 AM, alex goretoy
<aleksandr.goretoy at gmail.com>wrote:

> or use . (dot) where variable and () (parans) where function
>
> duck()().
> or
> duck.().()
> or
> for long sentences
> duck.[].()()...
>
> using dot seperator or double dot separator for application where its
> currently not being used, but for syntax errors
> -Alex Goretoy
> http://www.goretoy.com
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:15 AM, alex goretoy <aleksandr.goretoy at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> actually it would be more like
>>
>> import os
>> def quacks(value):
>>     return "%s/%s%s"% (os.environ["PWD"],os.path.dirname(__file__),value)
>> _aduck="goose"
>> duck = if is not os.path.exists quacks str(_aduck)
>>
>>
>> to perform the calls
>> duck()()
>>
>> this would only with with functions that return something though, I
>> believe....
>>
>>
>> -Alex Goretoy
>> http://www.goretoy.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:08 AM, alex goretoy <
>> aleksandr.goretoy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> import os
>>> def quacks(self,value):
>>>     return (1,0)[value]
>>> _aduck="~/goose"
>>> duck = if os.path.exists quacks str(_aduck)
>>> duck()()
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20090315/c7867b66/attachment-0001.html>