create boolean

[Grant Edwards]

On 2009-03-09, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Grant Edwards <grante at visi.com> wrote:
>
>> I didn't say that he hadn't authorized that assumption. ??I
>> just said that the code does rely on such an assumption. ??In
>> my experience, assumptions like that result broken code down
>> the road.
>
> And assumptions like "when assumptions fail, it is save to go by the
> letter of the requirement" don't?

If the requirement is wrong, then it doesn't really matter what
you assume.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow! OVER the underpass!
                                  at               UNDER the overpass!
                               visi.com            Around the FUTURE and
                                                   BEYOND REPAIR!!