Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

[Russ P.]

On Jan 20, 10:56 pm, Paul Rubin <http://phr...@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote:

> Also, attribute protection is just a tiny aspect.  The high assurance
> community really wants as much static verification as it can possibly
> get.  Python doesn't really lend itself to that.

Which is why I was hoping that Python might get enforced data hiding
as well as optional static type declarations that can actually be used
for static verification. But maybe that's all just a pipe dream on my
part -- or "onanism."