Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

[Steve Holden]

r wrote:
> [stevie]
> On the other hand... Bruno's question is unfair. It is perfectly
> reasonable to (hypothetically) consider Python to be the best
> *existing*
> language while still wanting it to be improved (for some definition
> of
> improvement). Just because somebody has criticisms of Python, or a
> wish-
> list of features, doesn't mean they hate the language.
> [/stevie]
> 
> WOW Steven, i am very impressed. That's the first thing you have said
> in a very long time that i totally agree with! Keep this up and i may
> put you back on my Python Brethren list :)

What can one do to get *off* it? ;-)
-- 
Steve Holden        +1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC              http://www.holdenweb.com/