Re: 'u' Obselete type – it is identical to 'd'. (7)

[mathieu]

On Feb 24, 9:24 pm, John Machin <sjmac... at lexicon.net> wrote:
> On Feb 25, 4:48 am, mathieu <mathieu.malate... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I did not know where to report that:
>
> > 'u'     Obselete type – it is identical to 'd'.       (7)
>
> >http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting
>
> So what's your problem with that? Do you believe that 'u' is not
> accepted? That 'u' is not identical to 'd' and thus the doc should be
> rewritten as "its behaviour is identical to that of 'd'"? That the
> behaviour of 'u' is NOT identical to that of 'd'? That 'u' should not
> be documented? That 'u' should not be described as obselete?
                                                     ^^^^^^^^

lol :)