zlib interface semi-broken

[Scott David Daniels]

Paul Rubin wrote:
> Scott David Daniels <Scott.Daniels at Acm.Org> writes:
>> Seems like we may want to say things like, "synchronization points are
>> too be silently ignored."
> 
> That would completely break some useful possible applications, so should
> be avoided.
No, I mean that we, _the_users_of_the_interface_, may want to say, ....
That is, I'd like that behavior as an option.

-Scott David Daniels
Scott.Daniels at Acm.Org