Not fully OO ?

[Patrick Mullen]

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Bruno Desthuilliers
<bdesth.quelquechose at free.quelquepart.fr> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:00:59 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>>
>>> Patrick Mullen a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Depending on the scale of the website I am making, how much I care
>>>> about editing it in the future, and how much I just want to get
>>>> something up, I will occasionally use php.  And I am a self confessed
>>>> php hater :)  But it's generally the fastest way I know to get
>>>> something up.  So even terrible languages can have their uses!
>>>
>>> Sorry but I fail to see how it relates to the current thread ???
>>
>> I think Patrick is responding to a comment from Tino Wildenhain:
>
> That didn't showed here (reading this from c.l.py via free.fr). Sorry.
>
>> [quote]
>> Well then it still depends on the perception of "job done". For example
>> PHP programmers would bet their soul that their language of choice is
>> exactly the right one to "get the job done." [end quote]
>>
>> Patrick, you will cause much less confusion if you quote relevant parts of
>> the text you are replying too.
>
> Indeed. At least it would have made clear (to me) there was something
> missing in the thread...
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Whoops, sorry for the confusion everyone.  Usually I do keep the
comments, don't know what happened there.