Not fully OO ?

[Steven D'Aprano]

On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:13:08 +0000, Duncan Booth wrote:

> This is a good indication that the
> author doesn't know much about OOP.

I think you can drop the last two words :)

Actually that's unfair -- it looks like he knows quite a bit about the 
metallicity of quasers, but he's just parroting a bunch of Java concepts 
as if Java was the be-all and end-all of object oriented programming, 
which is clearly wrong because we all know that Python's object model is 
the One True OOP.

*wink*


-- 
Steven