Not fully OO ?

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit :
> In message
> <ee99e813-97e0-404c-a512-748d0d148f8c at b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> Aaron "Castironpi" Brady wrote:
> 
>> Wikipedia puts it decently: "mainly for OO programming, but with some
>> procedural elements."
> 
> "Procedural" is the opposite of "functional", not "object-oriented".

AFAIK, the "opposite" if functional is imperative, not procedural. But 
let's not waste too much time on terminology arguments...