Not fully OO ?

[Tim Rowe]

2008/9/23 Craig Allen <callen314 at gmail.com>:

> So python may turn out to be pure OO

I think that's the sort of thing the pedants would hang that hats on,
too. Python isn't *pure* OO, in that it lets the programmers do non-OO
if they want to, but it is *fully* OO in that it includes everything
required to do OO.  But maybe the original blogger meant by "fully OO"
what I mean by "Pure OO"?

The question I usually ask is "Does this language help me get the job
done?" Python often does. That's all that really matters, isn't it?

-- 
Tim Rowe