2.6, 3.0, and truly independent intepreters
Philip Semanchuk
philip at semanchuk.com
Sat Oct 25 13:55:03 EDT 2008
On Oct 25, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Michael Sparks wrote:
> Glenn Linderman wrote:
>
>> In the module multiprocessing environment could you not use shared
>> memory, then, for the large shared data items?
>
> If the poshmodule had a bit of TLC, it would be extremely useful for
> this,
> since it does (surprisingly) still work with python 2.5, but does
> need a
> bit of TLC to make it usable.
>
> http://poshmodule.sourceforge.net/
Last time I checked that was Windows-only. Has that changed?
The only IPC modules for Unix that I'm aware of are one which I
adopted (for System V semaphores & shared memory) and one which I
wrote (for POSIX semaphores & shared memory).
http://NikitaTheSpider.com/python/shm/
http://semanchuk.com/philip/posix_ipc/
If anyone wants to wrap POSH cleverness around them, go for it! If
not, maybe I'll make the time someday.
Cheers
Philip
More information about the Python-list
mailing list