SWIG vs. ctypes (Was: ANN: PyEnchant 1.5.0)
Diez B. Roggisch
deets at nospam.web.de
Tue Nov 25 10:34:39 EST 2008
Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <mailman.4514.1227625056.3487.python-announce-list at python.org>,
> Ryan Kelly <ryan at rfk.id.au> wrote:
>
>> * Migrated from SWIG to ctypes for the C binding:
>
> Ryan,
>
> I'm looking at a doing a Python wrapper for a C++ library. We've already
> done a Perl wrapper for this library using SWIG (I wasn't personally
> involved in that effort). I'm debating whether I should do the Python
> version with SWIG or ctypes. I'd be interested to hear about your
> experiences with both and why you switched.
You can't use ctypes for C++, only for C-style APIs.
Diez
More information about the Python-list
mailing list