is there really no good gui builder

[Kevin Walzer]

Phil Thompson wrote:

> 
> The only "additional" restrictions are those imposed by the *commercial*
> license. As I said before, those restrictions are intended to discourage
> commercial developers from avoiding paying license costs during their
> development phase.
> 
>

Is this interpretation of Qt's license correct:

A developer may use the open-source edition of Qt to develop commercial 
software with licenseing fees, provided that the developer releases the 
product and source code under an open-source license compatible with the 
GPL..

This means that if the developer is willing to take the risk of having 
all product source code open, with the attendant possibility of a 
modified version of the developer's product being freely redistributed 
without code enforcing any licensing fees, then the developer may forego 
paying commercial  license fees to Qt (and Riverbank, if the product is 
PyQt) and use the open-source version.

-- 
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com