Python 3 __cmp__ semantic change?
Colin J. Williams
cjw at ncf.ca
Sat Nov 22 11:17:59 EST 2008
Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Steve Holden schrieb:
>
>> If it's not present then it would be worth reporting it as a 3.0 bug -
>> there's still time to get it in, as the release isn't due until early
>> December.
>
> Seems it was removed on purpose - I'm sure there was a good reason for
> that, but may I ask why? Instead of the sleek __cmp__ function I had
> earlier, I now have code like:
>
>
> def __lt__(self, other):
> return self.__cmp__(other) < 0
>
> def __le__(self, other):
> return self.__cmp__(other) < 0
>
> def __gt__(self, other):
> return self.__cmp__(other) > 0
>
> def __ge__(self, other):
> return self.__cmp__(other) >= 0
>
> Does anyone know the reason why __cmp__ was discarded?
>
> Kind regards,
> Johannes
>
Johannes,
Isn't the problem with your original
post that x and y are either of
different types or, is of the same type
that the values of that type are not
strictly comparable? It seems that the
old approach was to make a recursive
comparison.
Colin W.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list