Am I missing something with Python not having interfaces?

[J. Cliff Dyer]

On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 13:25 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Marcel Eichler wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 08 Mai 2008 13:02:52 schrieb J. Clifford Dyer:
> > 
> > > > I didn't said that interfaces are a kind of duck-typing. In fact it
> > > > was the exact opposite.
> > > >
> > > > > Sometimes you need that kind of rigor, and you can get it as
> > > > > easily as
> > > >
> > > > And sometimes you need more. So what?
> > >
> > > More rigor than Zope's interfaces offer?  
> > 
> > Did i say that? I only explained why interfaces are not 'simple method 
> > stubs'.
> > 
> 
> Um.  Yes.  I said "sometimes you need that kind of rigor," and proceeded
> to explain how zope interfaces offer it. (which you snipped from your
> quotation), and you said "sometimes you need more."  If you were
> actually responding to what I said, then "sometimes you need more" must
> mean more than zope interfaces.  
> 
> > > That's new information to 
> > > me. Perhaps you should stop being argumentative for a moment, and
> > > explain exactly what it is you're looking for and why Zope interfaces
> > > don't fit the bill.
> > 
> > Perhaps you should read more accurate. It's not my thread and i'm not 
> > looking for anything here.
> > 
> 
> Then what were you trying to say?
> 
-- 
Oook,
J. Cliff Dyer
Carolina Digital Library and Archives
UNC Chapel Hill