[x for x in <> while <>]?

[Terry Reedy]

"urikaluzhny" <ukaluzhny at nds.com> wrote in message 
news:f8229614-a000-450e-85eb-825e6c1386cf at w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
| It seems that I rather frequently need a list or iterator of the form
| [x for x in <> while <>]

I can think of two ways to interpret that.

| And there is no one like this.
| May be there is another short way to write it (not as a loop). Is
| there?

Using loops to write an example of what you mean would make the above 
clearer.

tjr