unittest: Calling tests in liner number order

[Roy Smith]

In article 
<a2c4d209-e203-4b43-aa57-f9f0248b2409 at a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
 Fuzzyman <fuzzyman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Whilst I understand your point, I think the danger is that you end up
> with hidden dependencies on the test order - which you're not aware of
> and that the tests never expose.

Well, yes.  But, this is no worse than the current situation, where the 
tests are run in alphabetical order by default.  You could still have 
hidden dependencies and not realize it.