Storing objects in relational database

Piotr Chamera piotr_chamera at poczta.onet.pl
Sat May 24 07:01:30 EDT 2008


bruno.desthuilliers at gmail.com pisze:
> I don't know if you'd label it 'elegant', but as far as I'm concerned,
> storing serialized objects as blobs in a relational database is mostly
> non-sense. If I use a relational database, it's because it is a
> *relational* database. If you want an OODB, then we have the ZODB,
> Durus and a couple others.

It is sometimes convenient to store objects in mature relational 
database backend (reliability,  stability, support, tools,
replication, etc.). See latst efforts with RelStorage backend
for ZODB (http://wiki.zope.org/ZODB/RelStorage) - it stores
pickled Python objects in Oracle, PostgreSQL or MySQL)



More information about the Python-list mailing list