morning in Python

[castironpi]

On May 17, 5:35 am, Ivan Illarionov <ivan.illario... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:57:08 -0700, castironpi wrote:
> > Full day later, I think it, to emphasize state, would prioritize
> > context.  The reason for the huge ramble was, believe it or not,
> > namespace conflict... as though any other states around here might nose
> > in.  And thanks to 'inhahe' for coming back with the question.  ...Which
> > would explain next move to 'prioritize context'. Context is a high
> > priority for people.
>
> > I'm proposing to start on one on a computer.  The first things a
> > computer 'knows' are the boot, keyboard, & mouse.  Yet on another scale,
> > the first things it knows are BIOS, file system, and OS.  On still
> > another, the only thing it knows are interruptions.  Knowledge is
> > important to context.  (The scales are ram on disk on, ram on disk off,
> > and ram off, which may tell of the currency they and their power are
> > bought with.  Thence, we should be getting different values for lengths
> > of time.)
>
> > (Furthermore, we're all on different longitudes -and- latitudes.)
>
> > Context comes from motion, perception, and composite perception
> > (reperception e.a.o. memory).  There is some reason to believe that
> > motion and sight are different senses, perhaps so with stationary sound
> > (gatcha) and mobile sound too.  Do you go deaf of a tone after prolonged
> > duration?  That makes computers valuable commodities*: they have a
> > symbolic interface, which no other unlive objects have.  They have both
> > mouse and keyboard.
>
> > *I'm sure there is a precision to wants: what magnitude of what types of
> > action a person wants from a day and for a time-- what energy states
> > they go to and from (note phone on come to and come from.)
>
> > Therefore, context should originate in mouse and keyboard.
>
> > Humans have symbolic know-how: knowledge of how to convey intent
> > digitally, though it may be there is no interpolation of 'intent per
> > mouse-or-key', even though people are prone to empathize with faces.
> > However, if you start with a 'me' and a 'no', you can get pretty
> > logical.
>
> > Intent per mouse-and-key isn't necessarily scalar, three-dimensional, or
> > rationally dimensional (?), though they do have magnitudes per mass and
> > volume.  The contingent of 'rationally dimensional' is having or
> > beknowing/benouncing an orthonormal basis.  Incidentally, '''orthography
> > of a language specifies the correct way of using a specific writing
> > system to write the language. .. Orthography is derived from Greek ὀρθός
> > orthós ("correct") and γράφειν gráphein ("to write").''' - wikipedia.
>
> > Further incidentally, context and state may have more important in
> > common than priority and price: privacy and safety are involved ex
> > hypothesi.  Incidentally = ...
>
> > It is not clear that the first (cheapest best) human-computer language
> > is a computer language, though if two were orthonormal in comparison to
> > life, Python's fine.  Not my first.
>
> > In privacy concerns, it is not clear that duals aren't primitives to
> > humans.  What's a brain primitive?  Lol: what is a primitive brain?
>
> > On May 16, 10:58 am, "inhahe" <inh... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'm not an expert in this but what does it mean to emphasize state?  It
> >> seems the opposite of that would be a) functional programming, and b)
> >> passing parameters instead of using global or relatively local
> >> variables. And maybe c) coroutines (generators as implemented in
> >> Python), although perhaps coroutines could be said to emphasize state
> >> inasmuch as they go out of their way to capture, objectify and reuse it
> >> (Stackless' microthreads, even moreso).  And Python seems to be
> >> well-noted for implementing some functional programming methodology,
> >> and as for passing parameters it's just as object-oriented as the rest
> >> of them.
>
> >> But as I said, I'm not an expert, so let me know if I've gone astray..
>
> >> > I have a proposition to ask you all: Python emphasizes state.  Is it
> >> > true?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> Castironpi,
>
> I love you! You remind me of all the kittens and puuppies I had when I
> was a child.
>
> I #define this. Hope your database could give us something funny again.
>
> -- Ivan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I have to talk about crossing threats.  But talking about threads is
like talking, and people talk about food.  What are some threats to be
scared of?  What about threads to be thunder?