at-exit-thread
Gabriel Genellina
gagsl-py2 at yahoo.com.ar
Sat Mar 1 01:35:07 EST 2008
En Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:12:13 -0200, <castironpi at gmail.com> escribió:
> On Feb 29, 1:55 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de... at nospam.web.de> wrote:
>> castiro... at gmail.com schrieb:
>>
>> > The Python main interpreter has an at-exit list of callables, which
>> > are called when the interpreter exits. Can threads have one? What's
>> > involved, or is the best way merely to subclass Thread?
>>
>> Is that some sort of trick-question?
>>
>> class MyThread(Thread):
>>
>> def run(self):
>> while some_condition:
>> do_something()
>> do_something_after_the_thread_ends()
>>
>> The atexit stuff is for process-termination which is/may be induced by
>> external signals - which is the reason why these callbacks extist.
>> Threads don't have that, thus no need.
>
> That depends. If a thread adds an object it creates to a nonlocal
> collection, such as a class-static set, does it have to maintain a
> list of all such objects, just to get the right ones destroyed on
> completion?
Yes, like any other objects. All threads in a process share the same
memory space; any thread can "see" any other created object, and the
general rules on reference counting apply: an object is destroyed when it
is no more referenced.
There are threading.local objects, which are specially designed to provide
per-thread storage; they are not shared among threads. (BTW, you should
use a threading.local instance instead of indexing by get_ident())
> Processes destroy their garbage hassle-free; how can
> threads? And don't forget Thread.run( self ) in the example, if
> anyone ever wants to make use of the 'target' keyword.
Any object created inside a thread will be destroyed when the last
reference to it is removed, as any other object. Threads are not special
in this regard.
--
Gabriel Genellina
More information about the Python-list
mailing list