Pycon disappointment

[George Sakkis]

On Mar 18, 1:49 pm, Mike Orr <sluggos... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 6:10 am, Bruce Eckel <lists.ec... at gmail.com> wrote:
> vendors:

> > On top of that, the quality of the presentations was unusually low.
>
> I did feel that.  An advanced track would be a good idea. Because
> you do need to repeat stuff for the newbies.  At least 30% of the
> attendees were at PyCon for the first time.

Not all first-comers are newbies; I attended for the first time too
but I've been using Python for the last four years or so. My overall
(totally unscientific) impression was that most attendants had at
least a decent grasp of the language.

George