optional static typing for Python

[Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch]

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:31:43 -0800, John Nagle wrote:

>     Unenforced static typing is somewhat pointless.  If that
> goes in, it should be enforced by implementations.

Luckily we don't get static typing.  We get annotations which *can* be
used for type hints, checked by additional code.  Can be used for other
things as well.

Ciao,
	Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch