Threads vs. continuations

Aahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Tue Feb 19 16:30:40 EST 2008


In article <061541c8-1f37-42bc-8041-170fee9707b4 at h25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
 <miller.paul.w at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>If that's the case, it seems threads plus hygeinic macros and a few
>primitives a la Scheme would form a solid basis upon which to build a
>programming language.  The only thing preventing Python from being
>that language is the difficulty of integrating a macro system, n'est-
>ce pas?

"Difficulty" as measured in Guido being less likely than the survival of
a snowball in the Sahara to ever consider anything like hygenic macros.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of     
indirection."  --Butler Lampson



More information about the Python-list mailing list