Why not a Python compiler?

[Jeff Schwab]

Steve Holden wrote:
> Ripter001 at gmail.com wrote:
>>>  Why not a Python COMPILER?
>>
>> What about a Python JIT hardware chip, so the CPU doesn't have to
>> translate. Although it seems to me that with today's dual and quad
>> core processors that this might be a mute point because you could just
>> use one of the cores.
>>
> What about a chip that reads your mind and does what you want it to?

+1!

> I am sure that would be popular with all the frustrated computer users 
> there are in the world.

I'll take two.  (Chips, not frustrated users).

-- 
"I sold the cow for these magic ICs," said Jack.