future multi-threading for-loops

[Boris Borcic]

castironpi at gmail.com wrote:
> On Feb 5, 12:26 am, Gabriel Genellina <gagsl-... at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
>> On 5 feb, 03:46, castiro... at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Some timing stats: On Windows XP, Python 3.0a2.
(...)
>>> Are threads an OS bottleneck?
>> I don't understand your threading issues, but I would not use 3.0a2
>> for benchmarking anything (except benchmarking Python 3.0 itself).
>> AFAIK the developers are first trying to get it right and stable;
>> speed issues will be addressed later.
>>
>> --
>> Gabriel Genellina
> 
> Multi-threaded control flow is a worthwhile priority.

What he said is that you should apply the idea to the mixing of your thread of 
benchmarking with the thread of python development.